Request for Quote

Request for Qualifications for Architectural and Engineering Services RFQ# JBCP-2014-03-BR

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2014

Description

Update: December 15, 2014
Intent to Award

Update: November 12, 2014

Short List Announcement

Addendum 2- Update Schedule of Events

Update: October 16, 2014

Addendum 1 - Changes to RFQ/Questions and Answers

The Judicial Branch Capital Program office (JBCP) of the Judicial Council seeks to identify and select a qualified architectural concern and their consulting engineering team to provide services in all phases of pre-design, design and construction of the new courthouse for the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.

Requests for clarifications or questions must be submitted to CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov by no later than 5 P.M. on Friday, October 10, 2014.

Written submittals must be received no later than 2 P.M. on Friday, October 24, 2014

Hard copy submittals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Division, Finance
Attn: Nadine McFadden – RFQ#JBCP-2014-03-BR
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in the RFQ and documents provided below:

Request for Qualifications

Attachment A - Project Description

Attachment B – Qualifications Questionnaire

Attachment C - Standard Agreement (Sample Document)

Attachment D – Form for Submission of Questions

Attachment E - Payee Data Record Form

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.