-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2015
Description
Update: June 24, 2015
Notice of Intent to Award
Update: June 3, 2015
Short List Announcement
Update: May 19, 2015
Addendum 2 – Questions and Answers
Update: May 8, 2015
Addendum 1 – Schedule of Events-Correction and Update
The Judicial Council of California, Capital Program, seeks to retain the services of a qualified Construction Manager with expertise in all phases of preconstruction and construction of public buildings. The Judicial Council is soliciting qualifications and proposals for furnishing Preconstruction Services and Construction Management Services with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMAX) for the Project, as described in this RFQ/P.
The selected firm will apply its expertise to all aspects of the Project in collaboration with other project participants to produce a court building that provides significant value to the state judicial system. Selection will be made on the basis of a combination of qualifications and price.
Written SOQs and proposals must be received no later than 2 P.M. on Tuesday, May 26, 2015.
Requests for clarifications or modifications must be submitted to CapitalProgramSolicitations@jud.ca.gov by no later than 2 P.M. on Wednesday, May 13, 2015.
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: Nadine McFadden – JBCP-2015-09-BR
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in RFQ/P No. JBCP-2015-09-BR
Request for Qualifications/Proposals (through Attachment 4)
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.