Request for Proposal

Statewide Internet-based Employment Recruitment Software Solution Program

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2008

Description


RFP Number: HR-1008-BD

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on behalf of the 58 Superior Courts of California, (individually referred to as a Purchasing Group member) is requesting proposals from highly qualified vendors with expertise in providing an internet-based employment recruitment software solution and maintenance service, on a statewide basis.

The AOC intends to award one or more Master Agreements, for an initial two year term and three one-year options, to a vendor or vendors able to supply the Purchasing Group members with an unknown quantity of software, as further described in the RFP. Each of the Purchasing Group members may individually, at their discretion, order software solution configuration specific to their needs, from any Master Agreement that may result from this RFP.

Proposals must be received no later than 1 p.m. Pacific Time, Monday, December 15, 2008.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:

Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Nadine McFadden, HR-1008-BD
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Complete details and deadlines regarding solicitation and program requirements are set forth in Request for Proposal (RFP) No. HR-1008-BD and the related documents below:

Request for Proposal

Attachment B - Purchasing Group Member Address List

Attachment G - W9 Form

Addendum No. 1

Addendum No. 2

Addendum No. 3 - Schedule

Questions and Answers

Notice of Intent to Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.