-
StatusArchived
-
Archived2016
Description
Update: July 28, 2016
Notice of Intent to Award
The Judicial Council of California, Conference Services Unit seeks proposals from hotels for a series of room blocks in San Francisco – New Judge Orientation program. The RFP indicates a series of dates for the 2016/2017 fiscal calendar. It is not necessary to bid on every set of dates. Multiple contracts will be awarded as necessary.
Questions can be directed to conferencesolicitations@jud.ca.gov until end of business day Thursday, June 16, 2016. Questions and answers received will be posted on Friday, June 17, 2016.
Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY, Wednesday, June 29, 2016. Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Attn: 5th Floor Receptionist, RFP No. CRS PD 185
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS PD 185
The Judicial Council of California, Conference & Registration Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.
Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPS
Attachment 2 – Judicial Council of California Hotel Agreement Template
Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification
Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical Requirements and Cost Proposal
Attachments
Disclaimer
The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.