Request for Proposal

AJP, RFP# CRS-EG-058

  • Status
    Archived
  • Archived
    2013

Description

The Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Conference Services Unit seeks proposals from hotels for a full conference program in SF, San Mateo County or Sacramento on October 22 – 24, 2014.

Any questions must be directed via email only to conferencesolicitations@jud.ca.gov by 5:00 pm Pacific Time, Tuesday, September 17, 2013.

Proposals must be received by END OF BUSINESS DAY Pacific Time, Tuesday, September 24, 2013.

Hard copy proposals must be delivered to:
Judicial Council of California
Administrative Office of the Courts
Attn: Reception desk
John Remington, RFP No. CRS EG-058
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further information regarding this solicitation is set forth in Request for Proposals (RFP) No. CRS EG-058

The Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Conference & Registration Services does not retain the services of third party or outsourced representation. All quoted rates are to be net, not commissionable.

Request for Proposal

Attachment 1 - Administrative Rules Governing RFPS

Attachment 2 – AOC Hotel Agreement

Attachment 3 - Vendors Acceptance of Terms and Conditions

Attachment 4 - Darfur Contracting Act Certification

Attachment 5 – Submission Form for Technical Proposal

Attachment 6 – Submission Form for Cost Proposal

Attachment 7 - Conflict of Interest Certification Form

Intent to Award

Notice of Award

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.