Request for Proposal

Consultant for AB 1981 Jury Pilot Program

  • Status
    Canceled
  • Deadline
  • ID#
    RFP# OCR23-152RB

Description

The Judicial Council of California (JCC) seeks the services of a consultant with expertise in the jury service process and communicating and collecting data from the courts. The consultant will provide significant support to conduct the jury compensation pilot program with the six participating courts to provide significant support to formulate the report to the legislature on the findings of the pilot program. The consultant will work out how the data related to the pilot (jury demographics, jury participation rates, jury summons rates, etc.) will be relayed to the Judicial Council (JCC) and work out the frequency of these reports. Additionally, prior to the implementation of the pilot, the consultant will provide support to the JCC to collect baseline data for the pilot program. This baseline data can be used to compare to the overall findings of the pilot. The consultant will be required to keep track of the data that the courts relay to the Judicial Council.

Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to solicitations@jud.ca.gov and must be received no later than September 11, 2023. Proposals must send to solicitations@jud.ca.gov on September 29, 2023:

Attention: Solicitation Officer
RFP No: OCR23-152RB
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688

Further details regarding the solicitation are set forth in the RFP and related documents are provided below.

Attachments

Disclaimer

The Judicial Council, as a public entity, prohibits direct contact with any Council personnel during the solicitation process in order to maintain fairness and equality to all proposers. Proposers are specifically directed NOT to contact any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants for meetings, conferences, or discussions that are related to the solicitation at any time between release of the solicitation and any award and execution of a contract. Unauthorized contact with any judicial branch entity personnel or consultants may be cause for rejection of the Proposer’s proposal.